Ultimate Corporate Greed? Disney Tries to Block Wrongful Death Lawsuit Using 'Disney+ Free Trial' Loophole
ORLANDO, FL — In a shocking legal move that has sparked massive international outrage, the Walt Disney Company attempted to throw out a wrongful death lawsuit by claiming the grieving husband had previously agreed to the terms and conditions of a "Disney+ Free Trial."
The Tragic Incident: The heartbreaking case centers around Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan, a 36-year-old physician who visited a restaurant at Disney Springs with her husband, Jeffrey Piccolo. Despite repeatedly warning the waiter about her severe dairy and nut allergies and being assured the food was safe, Dr. Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction shortly after eating and tragically passed away.
The Shocking Legal Defense: Seeking justice for his wife's preventable death, Piccolo filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Disney. However, Disney's lawyers immediately fired back with a chilling defense: They argued the lawsuit must be thrown out of court because Piccolo had signed up for a one-month free trial of the Disney+ streaming service five years ago.
Disney claimed that buried in the fine print of that free trial was an "arbitration clause" meaning he signed away his right to ever sue the company in front of a jury for any reason.
Public Backlash: The internet erupted in absolute fury over the idea that signing up to watch a movie could cost you your constitutional right to a fair trial if a company's negligence kills your spouse. Following massive public boycotts and relentless media pressure, Disney eventually backed down, but the terrifying reality of hidden "Terms & Conditions" has left consumers everywhere horrified.

Comments
Post a Comment
God Bless You ❤️